|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Useful ReferencesCummings, R. and English, B. (1999) A Framework for Selecting an Appropriate Design for a Program Evaluation Study. Evaluation News and Comment, Vol 7, No 2. pp 12-19. Funnell, S. (1997) Program Logic: an adaptable tool. Evaluation News and Comment, Vol 6, No 1. pp 5-17. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd Edition, Sage, 1994. http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/jc/ Guba, EG & Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative, Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, Scotland. http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/index.html Owen, J. (2006) Program Evaluation: Forms and Approaches (3rd ed.). Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin. Patton, MQ (1997) Utilization-focused Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Phillips, R., Bain, J., McNaught, C., Rice, M. and Tripp, D. (2000) Handbook for Learning-centred Evaluation of Computer-facilitated Learning Projects in Higher Education, Murdoch University and the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Available http://www.tlc.murdoch.edu.au/archive/cutsd99/handbook/handbook.html Reeves, TC (1997) Established and emerging evaluation paradigms for instructional design. In C. R. Dills & A. J. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional Development Paradigms (pp 163-178). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications. |
||